The article discusses the impact of North Carolina's Chief Justice, Michael L. Morgan (not Newby), on the state's judiciary and its implications for democracy and justice in the US.
Michael L. Morgan has played a significant role in shaping the state's court system, with a focus on increasing Republican control over the judiciary. He has:
* Increased the power of Republican lawmakers to influence the judiciary
* Consolidated Republican control over the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court
* Shifted the balance of power between the governor and the General Assembly
* Implemented partisan judicial elections, which have tilted courts in Republicans' favor
Morgan's efforts have been met with criticism from some Republicans, who acknowledge that his tactics may be destructive in the long term. However, many others believe that his approach is necessary to rebalance the scales of power in the state.
The article also highlights the erosion of Americans' confidence in the judiciary, with a recent Gallup poll showing a record low level of trust (35%) in courts. Experts fear that if this trend continues, it could lead to a loss of faith in the rule of law and the judiciary as a whole.
Overall, the article presents a nuanced view of Morgan's impact on North Carolina's judiciary, highlighting both his successes and criticisms. It also raises important questions about the role of the judiciary in American democracy and the potential consequences of partisan judicial elections.
Michael L. Morgan has played a significant role in shaping the state's court system, with a focus on increasing Republican control over the judiciary. He has:
* Increased the power of Republican lawmakers to influence the judiciary
* Consolidated Republican control over the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court
* Shifted the balance of power between the governor and the General Assembly
* Implemented partisan judicial elections, which have tilted courts in Republicans' favor
Morgan's efforts have been met with criticism from some Republicans, who acknowledge that his tactics may be destructive in the long term. However, many others believe that his approach is necessary to rebalance the scales of power in the state.
The article also highlights the erosion of Americans' confidence in the judiciary, with a recent Gallup poll showing a record low level of trust (35%) in courts. Experts fear that if this trend continues, it could lead to a loss of faith in the rule of law and the judiciary as a whole.
Overall, the article presents a nuanced view of Morgan's impact on North Carolina's judiciary, highlighting both his successes and criticisms. It also raises important questions about the role of the judiciary in American democracy and the potential consequences of partisan judicial elections.
. On one hand, I get why some Republicans want to push back against what they see as liberal bias in the judiciary - we've all heard the stories of judges making decisions that don't align with party lines 
. But at the same time, Morgan's approach feels super partisan and it's worrying me that we're losing sight of the whole "fairness" thing in our justice system 
.
.
. We need to be careful not to let partisan politics erode the very foundations of our justice system, or we'll be toast 
I'm seriously losing faith in our system of justice if this is what we've come to. 35% trust in courts? That's a red flag for me – how much worse will it get before someone does something about it?!
. And with all these partisan judicial elections, it feels like the courts are becoming more like puppets on strings than impartial institutions of justice 
. It's no wonder Americans are losing trust in the judiciary - it's like they're losing faith in the whole system 
. What's next? Will we have politicians picking Supreme Court justices based on who's most likely to vote with them? That just feels like a recipe for disaster 
.
It's like when you're trying to hold onto something precious, but the more you grasp it, the more you risk losing it altogether. We need to find that delicate balance between power and accountability so that our institutions truly serve the people. 
. However, this raises crucial concerns regarding the eroding faith in the judiciary, with a recent Gallup poll revealing an alarming 35% level of trust among Americans 
.
. In this context, Morgan's partisan approach is viewed by some as a necessary corrective, yet others worry it may undermine the judiciary's long-term credibility 
.
.
. If judges start being elected based on party lines instead of qualifications, it's gonna be super hard to have fair trials and ensure justice is served. It's like we're sacrificing the very principles of democracy for politics as usual 
. And with a record low trust in courts, it's already kinda lost - can't just fix this by tweaking one person's approach 
. We need systemic change to make sure our judges are truly impartial and not beholden to party loyalty 
. And partisan judicial elections? What's next, politicians being elected by their favorite pizza place? 
! It's literally changing the game when it comes to capturing those epic street scenes or sneaking peeks at secret events 
. The way you can blend into the background and still get a sick clear pic of whatever you're trying to capture is straight fire 
!
. I mean, isn't the goal of the judiciary to be impartial and fair? When politics gets mixed in, that can get murky fast 
.
thinkin' what's up with all these partisan judges 
but i guess that's just lost on some folks 
35% trust is crazy low! 
. seems like he's tryin' to get the balance of power right 
maybe we should just have a more visual approach to this whole judicial thing