Donald Trump's Mortgage Maze: Did He Break the Law or Just Make a Smart Investment?
In a stunning revelation, records show that Donald Trump signed two separate mortgage documents in the 1990s, claiming both properties would serve as his primary residence. However, instead of living there, he rented them out as investment properties, just months before the Trump administration began calling similar behavior "mortgage fraud."
ProPublica has uncovered documents demonstrating that within seven weeks of each other in late 1993 and early 1994, Trump obtained loans for two neighboring Palm Beach homes, pledging each would be his primary dwelling. The mortgage agreements came with standard occupancy requirements mandating Trump live in the properties for at least a year.
But Trump never lived in either home, instead renting them out annually to generate rental income. His real estate agent told the Miami Herald that the properties were leased annually, and Shirley Wyner, who served as rental agent for both homes, confirmed that Trump never resided there.
Trump's actions have been likened to mortgage fraud by his administration, but experts say proving intent is key in such cases. Mortgage finance expert Kathleen Engel notes that Trump's loans exceed the threshold established by his administration for fraudulent conduct.
The White House has defended Trump's transactions, stating that both mortgages came from the same lender and that there is no suggestion of illegality. However, critics argue that Trump's actions demonstrate a lack of transparency and accountability in his financial dealings.
Trump himself has called such behavior "deceitful and potentially criminal," but it remains to be seen whether he will face any consequences for his actions. The investigation into mortgage fraud by the Federal Housing Finance Agency has pursued several high-profile Democrats, but Trump's administration has yet to make publicly known any criminal referrals against Republican officials with similar mortgage patterns.
As one expert noted, the statute of limitations for mortgage fraud is long, and it remains unclear whether Trump's actions would fall within that timeframe. However, the revelation raises questions about Trump's financial dealings and his commitment to transparency in his personal finances.
In a stunning revelation, records show that Donald Trump signed two separate mortgage documents in the 1990s, claiming both properties would serve as his primary residence. However, instead of living there, he rented them out as investment properties, just months before the Trump administration began calling similar behavior "mortgage fraud."
ProPublica has uncovered documents demonstrating that within seven weeks of each other in late 1993 and early 1994, Trump obtained loans for two neighboring Palm Beach homes, pledging each would be his primary dwelling. The mortgage agreements came with standard occupancy requirements mandating Trump live in the properties for at least a year.
But Trump never lived in either home, instead renting them out annually to generate rental income. His real estate agent told the Miami Herald that the properties were leased annually, and Shirley Wyner, who served as rental agent for both homes, confirmed that Trump never resided there.
Trump's actions have been likened to mortgage fraud by his administration, but experts say proving intent is key in such cases. Mortgage finance expert Kathleen Engel notes that Trump's loans exceed the threshold established by his administration for fraudulent conduct.
The White House has defended Trump's transactions, stating that both mortgages came from the same lender and that there is no suggestion of illegality. However, critics argue that Trump's actions demonstrate a lack of transparency and accountability in his financial dealings.
Trump himself has called such behavior "deceitful and potentially criminal," but it remains to be seen whether he will face any consequences for his actions. The investigation into mortgage fraud by the Federal Housing Finance Agency has pursued several high-profile Democrats, but Trump's administration has yet to make publicly known any criminal referrals against Republican officials with similar mortgage patterns.
As one expert noted, the statute of limitations for mortgage fraud is long, and it remains unclear whether Trump's actions would fall within that timeframe. However, the revelation raises questions about Trump's financial dealings and his commitment to transparency in his personal finances.
. I mean, Trump signs these mortgage documents saying he’s going to live in them as his primary residence, but then he just rents them out? That doesn’t seem right to me. And the fact that the White House is defending him and not calling it out for what it is... shady 
.
. And another thing, how did no one notice this back in the day? You’d think with all the scrutiny he was under as president, someone would have dug deeper into his finances a lot sooner.
.
. And can we please focus on gettin' to the bottom of what actually happened instead of makin' assumptions about Trump's intentions? 
. Trump's whole thing sounds like a huge load of BS to me. If he claimed those properties were his primary residence and then rented them out as soon as possible, that's just common sense not being used here...like, if you want to claim a property is your primary residence, you should actually live there, right? 
.
. But when it comes to transparency and accountability, it's all about being honest with ourselves and others 
. And let's be real, if he was so confident that his actions were legit, why did he need to sign two separate mortgage documents? It just seems like a whole lot of unnecessary complexity 
.
. Will Trump face any consequences for his actions? Only time will tell 
. But one thing's for sure - it's all about being mindful of our own financial decisions and making choices that align with our values 
.
. The gov is all "this is mortgage fraud" but like how can u prove they actually intended to be dishonest? 
. Anyway, this is some sketchy stuff and Trump's administration is being pretty shady about it 
. Can't wait 2 see what happens next 
I mean, what's the big deal? He makes it work and that's all that matters. The government needs to get over itself and stop picking on him 
.
. The fact that he claimed both properties as his primary residence when in reality they were being rented out as investment properties does seem suspicious 
. However, given that Trump's loans exceed the threshold established by his administration for fraudulent conduct, it's hard not to raise eyebrows 
. As for Trump himself, calling his behavior "deceitful and potentially criminal" seems like a classic case of deflection 
.
I think Trump's situation is a perfect example of how nuanced the law can be when it comes to financial transactions. While he did technically break some rules by not living in those properties as claimed, I'm not convinced that his actions were maliciously intended. The distinction between 'mortgage fraud' and simply making smart investments is often blurred, especially for people like Trump who have a strong background in real estate.
and claimed they were his primary residence when we all know he was just trying to boost his investment portfolio 
.
, but the lack of transparency and accountability in his financial dealings is a major concern 
(Note: These stats are based on a recent survey and may not be exact, but they give you an idea of public opinion)
Let's see how long it takes for this to play out... 
.
.
...
. If Trump does get investigated and maybe even charged, that would be huge. But if he gets off scot-free, then I think it just highlights how weak the system is when it comes to holding powerful people accountable 
.
he was literally renting out these houses as if they were Airbnb properties but called it a mortgage lol. so he got loans for two homes saying one would be his primary residence, but really he just used them to make some extra cash. I guess that's what they mean by "think big" right? 
.
It's all a bit confusing, if you ask me...